HOLLIE GREIG - "DAME ELISH ANGIOLINI" TO BE CHARGED??

BREAKING NEWS!!!


Robert Green has filed charges with Dunblane Police in respect of the financial regularities (misappropriation of public funds) of 'Dame' Elish Angiolini in securing the law firm Levy & McRay. Therefore, Angiolini is now a suspect in a criminal investigation!!

Robert Green Found 'Guilty' By Despicable Scottish Establishment For Exposing Despicable Scottish Establishment

Wednesday, 25 January 2012 13:16

Robert was denied key defence witnesses, including former Scottish Lord Advocate, Elish Angiolini, whose behaviour was fundamentally relevant to the case. The outcome was never in doubt from the start. A thoroughly decent man has been 'convicted' for acting thoroughly decently. But the trial proved beyond doubt that there was no police investigation into the allegations of long-term abuse by Hollie Greig or the blatant murder of her uncle.



Robert will be sentenced on February 17th and if it is custodial we need to raise the bloody roof. More than half a million pounds of taxpayers' money has been spent to protect the low-life of the Scottish establishment in the most expensive breach of the peace case in Scottish history.



But all it has done is further expose them. The inner core of Scottish politics, legal system, law enforcement and judiciary is very, very dark, deeply Satanic, and controlled by the extensive network of secret societies and Satanic covens that connect with the Scottish aristocracy and the House of Windsor.



How long are you going to stand for this, Scotland?



Scottish people get off your knees.


http://www.davidicke.com/articles/child-abuse-mainmenu-74/30693-scottish-paedophile-ring-exposed?mid=57

####################################################################

HOLLIE GREIG VIDEOS, FULL FACTS =


THE FACTS OF THE CASE == Description: HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF FILE:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/kyv3fd

ROBERT GREEN EXPOSES SATANIC RITUAL CHILD ABUSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaRI-h9jVxM&feature=uploademail

HOLLIE GREIG - ROBERT GREENS BLOG

http://holliedemandsjustice-robertgreensblog.blogspot.com/2011_10_01_archive.html

ROBERT GREEN INTERVIEW- EDGE MEDIA 25 8 11 =

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF35AAC01128C697D

Autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned online...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mhfju-nNlgY

HOLLIE GREIG 15 MIN SPECIAL - TONY LEGEND MANCHESTER RADIO ONLINE 10 4 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqN1-3CIqQw

ROBERT GREEN ON HOLLIE GREIG - P DROCKTON RADIO 5 3 2010

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBA1F5B143DC56468

HOLLIE GREIG OFFICIAL SITE =

http://www.holliedemandsjustice.org/

...namaste...b.

#################################################################################################

Dunblane on Burns Day 2012

Posted on January 25, 2012

It was refreshing to be able to escape today from the stuffy confines of the Sheriff Court at Stonehaven,



Aberdeenshire to the glorious, open countryside of Stirlingshire with its many ‘sudden’ little hills, each



crowned with a castle in varying stages of crumbling.



Our digression from the direct route south back to England was not for the purpose of tourism or



refreshment, however, but had a serious purpose and our specific destination was Dunblane, where



Robert had a long overdue mission to fulfil, namely to report that town’s currently most high-



profile resident, Dame Elish Angiolini, to the police for theft of funds from the public purse of Scotland.



It is over 2 years since Angiolini, then Lord Advocate, engaged the private law firm Levy & McRae in



order to place an injunction on various organs of the press and media, including internet outlets, from



publishing articles in which her name was linked to that of Hollie Greig.



The cost of this complex operation is said to have been in the region of £50,000 and what it would be



very interesting to know – and certain legal organs have published articles posing this very question –



how the Lord Advocate, arguably the highest public servant in the land in 2009, financed this excursion



into the private domain, ostensibly purely in her own personal interests. Did she therefore use her own



funds, or did she, in some kind of cross-wired, confabulated reasoning going on in her mind at the time,



consider this hygienic expedient to be in the public interest and pay for it out of taxpayer’s money?



For the best part of 2011 the outgoing Lord Advocate resisted the attempts of the Freedom of



Information Commissioner, Kevin Dunion to secure an answer to this question, from which it has to be



concluded that Angiolini did indeed pay Levy & McRae’s bill out of public funds, but is unwilling to



admit that publicly, knowing what the consequences will be.



Robert having been freshly convicted as a criminal under Scottish law, largely because of Angiolini’s



dereliction of public duty in blocking any investigation of Hollie’s allegations during the time that she



was Procurator Fiscal for Aberdeen, 2000-05, and being quite sure the lady herself was behind his



arrest in February 2010, feels no compunction about bringing criminal charges against her. If the full



weight of Scottish justice has come down on him for trying to prevent crime, why not on her for



actively encouraging it, and committing further crime in the process?



The young constable who admitted us to the police station and received Robert’s report took down the



details in a methodical kind of way as if recording a car-theft, for which we gave him credit! and the



matter has been passed to those immediately upwards of Dunblane in the police-service pecking order,



Lothian and Borders Constabulary, for their consideration. At the time of writing it is not yet known if a



crime-file has been opened and a number issued; we can only wait and hope some areas of the Scottish



justice system are still free of corruption.



###################################################################################



Hollie says



Posted on January 25, 2012by Admin

Reply

This Video says it All but Know one is listening to me



From Holliexx


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t_0K-gPlyb0&feature=player_embedded

====================================================================

Trial Day 6 – Robert found guilty

Posted on January 24, 2012by Belinda

Robert was denied a second key defence witness today (Dame Elish Angiolini) by Sheriff Principal Bowen when he supported an objection to her citation by the Prosecution, on the grounds that she was IRRELEVANT TO THE CASE. He had already been denied the Procurator Fiscal Stephen McGowan as witness for the defence, despite unanimous support for his citation by all his legal representatives, past and present. Thus prospects of a successful defence were damaged from the beginning, yet another instance of bias by the Scottish justice system, in Robert’s view.



On taking the witness stand therefore Robert asked if he could make a statement on the record? but was refused by the Sheriff. His cross-examination then began and continued all morning, with the only other witness to be called today taking the stand in the last 10 minutes before the lunch-break.



Answering his Counsel’s questions with his customary eloquence and clarity, Robert stressed that his main object throughout the activity which had offended a few people in Scotland was to secure an investigation of Hollie’s allegations. He was able to quote from Dr Eva Harding’s letter in which Sylvia Major is named as an abuser and stated that this individual was sitting in the court.



Throughout Mr Lamb’s cross-examination Robert reiterated his belief that he was acting in the public interest in attempting to protect vulnerable citizens. He explained that he had tried every possible avenue prior to taking the action which had given rise to his being prosecuted, and that Anne Greig had also been directing her concerns through the normal legal channels since 2000. By the time of his arrest therefore, 10 years had passed during the whole of which time the authorities had obstructed every attempt to secure justice.



Robert also continued to stress that his efforts were designed to instigate an OPEN, INDEPENDENT INQUIRY into all aspects of Hollie’s case, including the abduction of Anne and the highly suspicious death of Robert Greig.



The Procurator Fiscal, Stephen McGowan then opened the Crown’s cross-examination of Robert. Robert immediately countered this by asking McGowan why he had passed a sheet of paper bearing the masonic symbol of the Square and Compass to Sheriff Patrick Davies on 30th April 2010? and asked what possible role the Freemasons could have had in the prosecution case. Unsurprisingly, the Sheriff blocked this question, which only served to underline how his refusal to allow McGowan to stand as a defence witness had helped to undermine Robert’s case.



McGowan continuously challenged Robert on his expertise on a wide range of technical subjects, including his knowledge of post-mortem examinations. Robert pointed out he was not a pathologist, nor had he ever claimed to be, but that his opinion on all these subjects was directed by the expert witness statements provided him by Anne Greig. Moreover, as the pathologist Dr Grieve had stated that he liked and trusted such people as the Majors, Sheriff Buchanan and Elish Angiolini, he could hardly be regarded as an impartial witness.



To be fair, McGowan did raise questions about a possible family relationship between individuals of the same surname not having been properly established. Robert conceded the possibility that there might be some grounds for doubt in this regard but stressed that what was at issue was what the individuals had been alleged to have done, rather than any family connections between them, real or otherwise, that might exist.



Further on in the discussion it became apparent that McGowan, when questioned by Robert, had little knowledge of the PCCS report to which the latter had referred. It also became clear that neither McGowan nor the Sheriff appeared to have any concept of the effect that Satanic Ritual Abuse has on those unfortunate enough to be forced into such a cult. Robert explained that for 14 years Hollie had suffered the most appalling ordeals in silence, due to having been terrorised by her father. Therefore, anyone with any knowledge of this issue would know that evidence provided even under oath could be unreliable. As things stand, the Scottish court system does not yet provide a facility for swearing oaths in the name of Lucifer, somewhat surprisingly.



The only other witness to be called by the defence was Steven Raeburn, Editor of the distinguished legal magazine The Firm. During a brief cross-examination by Defence and Prosecution, Mr Raeburn described clearly and authoritatively his attempts to engage individuals in the Crown Office in connection with issues relating to the FOI Commissioner, details of which have already been published. Whereupon Mr Lamb brought up the matter of the payment to Levy & McRae over Angiolini’s private legal actions. McGowan objected to Defence’s questions but was overruled by the Sheriff.



In the afternoon session both sides summed up and Mr Lamb skillfully had Robert acquitted of 3 of the 5 charges against him. However the Sheriff ruled that in his view Robert was guilty of Breach of the Peace and of breaking some of his bail conditions.



Sentencing has been deferred until Friday 17th February, until which time the bail conditions on Robert remain in force.



NOTE by Webmaster:



This week this site was visited by known and clearly identifiable establishment bodies.



Yesterday:

Scottish Executive – 1 visit

Today:

Council Of The European Union – Brussels – 4 visits

Commission Europeenne – 1 visit

Government Of South Africa – 2 visits

Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission – 7 visits

The Audit Commission – 1 visit

Police National Network – Eastcote, Bucks – 15 visits

Police National Network – Brierley Hill, Staffs – 6 visits today, 27 visits in last 3 days

Aberdeen City Council – 6 visits in last 3 days

.

With such high profile visits it was envisaged that either the establishment would offer up one of the accused to protect the rest, or would stamp on this case hard. The answer to that is in the title of this post.

.

There is still a case to answer however over the sheer cost of this case, nor will this campaign go away.


Trial Day 5 – Last Day of the Prosecution

Posted on January 23, 2012by Belinda

Roy Greig’s death featured strongly in today’s proceedings, in particular in the remainder of the evidence given by DS Drummond, followed by that of DC Crowder, the other Grampian officer who had arrested Robert on 12th February 2010, and that of Dr James Grieve, the senior pathologist who had carried out the autopsy in 1997.



When questioned by Defence Counsel Andy Lamb QC as to whether Robert had mentioned Sylvester Cadger in connection with Roy’s death during the police interview on 12 February, DS Drummond confirmed that he had. DC Crowder on the other hand, asked the same question, stated that he could not recall. The omission from the transcripts provided by the police and Crown of this vital information continues to cast a cloud over the integrity of the authorities concerned.



DC Crowder confirmed that Robert had reminded him when he was detained of his duty as a police officer to investigate crime; a police officer’s duty was to the law rather than to a senior officer. His response to the Crown’s question on this fundamental issue was initially vague and equivocal, but asked what he would do if he suspected a senior officer was up to no good he confirmed that he would investigate. It was somewhat heartening that he was prepared to make this statement on oath.



Dr James Grieve appeared next and began by making much of his qualifications and experience. When asked about the death of Robert Greig, however, his judgement would seem to have been affected by his close relationship with the late Terry Major and his wife Sylvia. It should be remembered that Sylvia Major was one of the 3 people named by the expert witness Dr Eva Harding whose evidence was supported by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in providing Hollie with public funds to help compensate for her suffering. We will quote directly from Dr Harding’s report: “When asked if anyone else had ever touched her she immediately said Sylvia. She explained that Sylvia was her father’s cousin. Surprised at this, I asked her how Sylvia had touched her. She clasped her own breast… She also mentioned other people such as Sylvia’s husband who is a policeman”. At the end of her report Dr Harding confirmed her belief that Hollie had been systematically sexually abused by her father and brother “and probably by others who had access to her.” This quite clearly included the Majors.



These are friends and associates of Dr Grieve’s, in fact Sylvia Major was seen warmly congratulating him on his evidence at close of court today. It would hence be extremely difficult for any reasonable person to regard Dr James Grieve as an impartial and reliable witness. He confirmed that questions had been asked before about his judgement, to the extent of action being taken against him, and that mistakes could be made. In the spring of 2011 he was also questioned about his role in the Claire Webster murder inquiry at the trial in Glasgow. As in the case of Roy Greig’s death Dr Grieve did not appear to suspect foul play and at the time of Mrs Webster’s death in a car-fire in the Grampian area the decision was that she had died accidentally. We now know that this supposedly accidental death was in fact as the result of murder by Malcolm Webster, a friend of Graeme Mackie and his wife Jillian, the latter having also like Grieve given evidence in both trials!



Dr Grieve continued to maintain today that Roy’s injuries, including the breaking of his sternum, said to be the hardest bone in the body, had come about due to resuscitation attempts. Interestingly, Dr Grieve stated his understanding that this had been carried out by a nurse who was on the scene. This is something of a revelation as neither the police, the fire-service, the Crown Office, the Royal Humane Society and the other witness, Sylvester Cadger seem to have any information on this individual or how he/she came to be at the scene at this remote spot on a dark, windy and rainy night at exactly the same time as Cadger.



In fairness to Dr Grieve, no one is suggesting that he could have been aware that Denis Mackie had been found by Roy Greig sexually abusing Hollie just prior to his death. Dr Grieve may also have been influenced by the official report we hold which states that the cause of death was regarded as suicide, a conclusion reached less than 4 hours after the arrival on the scene of the emergency services. Since then we have obtained a document from the NHS confirming that they have no knowledge of any authority requesting Roy’s medical records, without which a verdict of suicide could never have been reached. Mr Lamb asked why Dr Grieve’s autopsy report should not have been passed on to his next of kin, bearing in mind that Anne Greig had been requesting this document for 12 years. Dr Grieve went to some lengths to explain that the decision was not his but that of the Procurator Fiscal; it was not for him to decide the reason for the death, other than the conclusion reached in his report that it was by smoke inhalation. Any criminal investigation into a death of this sort was a matter for the police, not for him or his team.



Dr Grieve also admitted knowing Sheriff Graham Buchanan and Elish Angiolini, describing them both, along with Terry Major, as people he trusts. This is a somewhat puzzling position to take, given the exposure of Angiolini both through Robert’s investigations and those of the Freedom of Information Commissioner, and may cast yet further doubt on Dr Grieve’s judgement.



Another interesting witness was Rosemary Murray who was head-teacher of the sister Special Needs school sharing a campus with Beechwood School during the same period that Andrew Young was headmaster there.



She also stated that she worked in Aberdeen Court, and that she knew Sheriff Buchanan. One interesting disclosure was her confirmation that it was the schools’ policy for no staff ever to be alone with a pupil with the door closed, for “common sense” reasons, she said. As a result of Robert’s advertisement in the Aberdeen Press & Journal, 3 parents and 2 teacher colleagues had stated having been aware of Andrew Young regularly breaching this policy by having pupils with him in his study with the door closed for periods of up to 20 minutes at a time. Parents had told Robert that during these ‘sessions’ Young had spoken in French throughout to the pupils, a language they did not understand. One of the parents of an 11 year-old boy was sufficiently concerned about Mr Young to have retained the postcard Young had sent to the boy from his holiday in Egypt, the odd text of which has already been published.



A final reminder about Mr Young is that when questioned by Mr Lamb, he claimed that Hollie was not at Beechwood School when Dr Carter’s 2nd report about her being at risk was presented. This is incorrect. The report is dated 3rd February 1992 when Hollie was still a pupil of the school; she left in the summer of that year.



Young must have known this, as he must also have known about the first report in 1990, yet on neither occasion did he take any action.



One of the last witnesses to appear was Ian West, a retired tile-fixer from the Ferry Hill area who was worried by Robert’s January 2010 round-robin letter to local residents, in which he said that nothing had been done to investigate Hollie’s allegations regarding a paedophile ring operating in the neighbourhood. He went to the police because of his worry over this; he had grandchildren, he said. When asked by the prosecution if he thought it was true? he said until it was either proven or disproven, “you never know about these things, do you?”

This witness ably vindicates the point we have been making throughout this trial, that Grampian Police should have investigated Hollie’s allegations years ago and if they had, all the present public worry, embarrassment and distress would have been avoided. They should at the very least have pursued Hollie’s father, brother and her father’s cousin Sylvia Major and husband Terry Major, for whom the evidence that they abused Hollie was strongest. The problem was that Terry Major was the senior Forensics officer for Grampian Police and used his position to block any further forensic investigation of Hollie’s allegations, even though their medical forensics specialist at the time, Dr Frances Kelly had immediately found evidence on Hollie’s body that she was a victim of long-term abuse. The rest of the force at the time seems to have been somehow cowed into silence and inaction. With the result that even in death, Terry Major continues to block this investigation and could this be why his widow Sylvia dogs the present courtroom at Stonehaven, ready to congratulate any witness who gives evidence favourable to the ring? as we saw today in respect of Dr James Grieve. One can only wonder and indeed shudder at what favours such faithful champions of evil receive, having fulfilled their remit.
The final witness cited to appear, Councillor James Donnelly was curiously missing from court. This individual had been amicably discussing with Robert the concerns about the existence of the alleged ring operating in the area he represented, the Ferry Hill area. Robert had specifically contacted him in the public interest, as there could be some risk to those he represented or their families. Donnelly, a Conservative, had agreed to meet Robert at Union Square, Aberdeen on the evening of Friday 12th February in order to examine documents supporting Robert’s concerns. He was unable to meet him earlier as he was attending a Conservative meeting in Perth at which the main speaker was David Cameron. Robert was then unable to keep the appointment, having been arrested earlier that day.
Therefore, given Robert’s belief in Councillor Donnelly’s genuine concern, it came as a surprise to discover that whilst in discussion with Robert in apparent good faith, he had already made an official complaint about him to the police. Perhaps he had since become concerned that his appearance in court in the circumstances might have led to justifiable questions regarding his integrity as an elected official, charged to represent the people of Ferry Hill as a whole, rather than certain individuals of his personal acquaintance.

Tomorrow Tuesday the case for the Defence commences.

Trial Week 2 – ready to go

Posted on January 22, 2012by Belinda

Reply

Back in Stonehaven on the eve of Week 2 of his trial, Robert is looking forward to this second round of the proceedings, in which he will have more chance to input directly, rather than merely confirming to the court every morning that yes, he is indeed Robert Green!
He wishes to thank everyone for the helpful suggestions that have been coming in via his blog, this website, email and Facebook (via 3rd parties, Robert himself doesn’t do Facebook ).
This week Robert/his defence team will be able to recall any of the witnesses for the prosecution as well as producing their own witnesses. Of course everyone is hoping to see Dame Elish Angiolini take the stand. This would in itself be an admission of the irregularities that have occurred under her watch, first in Aberdeen, then nationally. But this may be too much for Sheriff Principle Bowen who’s in overall charge of these proceedings.
This is not the High Court, it is only a Summary court, as we’ve been reminded by those who understand such niceties. By the same token, Robert if sentenced will get 1 year at most rather than 5 or 6.
Whatever court this is, it promises to be another interesting week in Stonehaven, Aberdeenshire, Scotland.
Conspicuously absent from the line-up of 22 civilian witnesses last week (yes, the same number as Hollie’s alleged former abusers, yet these included others than on that particular list) were Denis and Greg Mackie, Hollie’s father and brother who are somewhere in Portugal or possibly Brazil, doubtless still busy tormenting children. The case against them is cast-iron, having being confirmed by police expert and medical evidence.
There is no excuse therefore for Grampian police not to have questioned these two at the very least, especially as Greg had already been charged with offences of a sexual nature on 3 occasions but was let off. Which Sheriff?

The rest of Hollie’s alleged abusers or fellow victims, of whom 13 took the stand last week, are all in some way connected with Mackie, as we shall see, and Robert may well decide to call any of them back.

If Robert & team recall these witnesses there are some hard questions they could be asked, especially with the revelations of inconsistencies in the documentation, which was updated over the weekend.

FROM: http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/60103-robert-green-found-guilty-by-despicable-scottish-establishment-for-exposing-despicable-scottish-establishment

← Older posts

....b.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



www.facebook.com/butlincat

www.myspace.com/butlincat/blog

www.youtube.com/butlincat6

www.butlincat.blogspot.com

the Musa case - Maurice Kirk: www.butlincat.wordpress.com