HIGH POLICE CORRUPTION - LEVESON ENQUIRY BBC NEWS 27 FEB

Disclose.tv - PRESS STANDARDS ENQUIRY 27 FEB 2012 BBC NEWS Video

LIVING IN A TENT IN EXPENSIVE OVERCROWDED LONDON BBC NEWS 27 FEB

Disclose.tv - LIVING IN A TENT IN OVERCROWDED EXPENSIVE LONDON Video

MASS EVICTION BY POLICE AT ST PAULS CATHEDRAL, LONDON, 28 FEB 2012

uploaded by Tzimnewman3 on 28 Feb 2012

Video by Jamie Kelsey-Fry =  http://yfrog.com/user/JamieKelseyFry/videos

http://occupylsx.org/

...b.

Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she'd lose her daughter

SEE PICS = http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html#ixzz1namMdhSQ


Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she'd lose her daughter


Eileen Fairweather


Last updated at 1:51 PM on 16th November 2008



Defiant: Nevres Kemal at home. 'I'm not going to shut up,' she told bosses

In a devastating interview, the social worker who blew the whistle on Haringey’s dire treatment of children before Baby P's death tells how the council tried to destroy her life - for telling the truth.

The whistleblower who warned about Haringey Council’s failing social services department six months before Baby P died has told how the council victimised her, even going to the extraordinary lengths of falsely accusing her of child abuse and beginning an investigation into her nine-year-old daughter’s welfare.

In an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, social worker Nevres Kemal said Haringey’s ‘monstrous’ allegation, which was made, she says, in response to the concerns she raised, left her terrified she would lose her daughter.

Miss Kemal had been accused, falsely, of shaking her fist in the face of a 14-year-old girl (not her daughter) which, according to Haringey, constituted ‘child abuse’.

She says: ‘They then turned their attention to my own daughter and launched a child protection investigation into her, which means that they felt she was at risk.

‘Ultimately, it could have led to her being taken away from me. I felt terribly frightened all the time. It was evil.’

She also revealed today how council staff were taken on 'team-building' junkets to Barcelona and Dublin and spent £1,000 on a tea party at the Ritz while back at work, cases of potentially abused children were piling up.

During what she calls a four-year ‘witch-hunt’, Miss Kemal, 44, lost her job, faced a police investigation and saw her family and health fall apart.

An employment tribunal heard that she had been singled out by her bosses because she was a whistleblower. Haringey eventually dropped the case and paid her undisclosed compensation.

An experienced child protection officer, Miss Kemal had joined the London borough in 2004, hoping it had learned lessons from the appalling episodes in its recent past, including the case of Victoria Climbie, the eight-year-old tortured and murdered in 2000.

Miss Kemal was ‘like a breath of fresh air’, said a colleague, ‘someone who liked to roll her sleeves up and set to work, rather than take part in meetings about meetings’.

Preventable: Nevres Kemal warned about Haringey Council's failing social services department six months before Baby P died

Yet very quickly it became apparent to Miss Kemal that the new management brought in to prevent a repeat of the murder of Victoria Climbie was still failing to protect children in its care. Unlike others, Miss Kemal did not remain silent.

She warned that there was a very real risk of another murder. Faced with her concerns, her managers took swift action – but not, it seems, to avert another tragedy.

While they were busy trying to smear her, says Miss Kemal, Baby P was being used as a punchbag and entering the final stage of his tragically short life.

Miss Kemal offers a damning behind-the-scenes insight into Haringey’s inept social services department.

More...Council lawyers advised Baby P should stay with his mother just nine days before he died

Revealed: How a close male relative of Baby P is linked to a big paedophile network

Baby P council chief hailed a 'champion' in letter of support from 61 headteachers



FIRST PICTURES: The chocolate smile that hid the terrible scars of abuse on tragic blue-eyed Baby P

'I loved him very deeply,' says natural father of Baby P in emotional tribute to son

‘God save us from endless inquiries,’ she says. ‘What Haringey needs is managers sacked and arrested, common sense to prevail and money put into frontline services.’

Children’s Services Director Sharon Shoesmith and Deputy Director Cecilia Hitchen have now agreed in writing that Miss Kemal never abused a child, in or outside of work.

‘I never regretted speaking up for the children who needed protection,’ says Miss Kemal.

Miss Kemal joined Haringey Council after the appalling case of Victoria Climbie, pictured, an eight-year-old girl tortured and murdered in 2000

‘I never thought, even when I was at my most scared, why did I not keep my mouth shut?

'Even my elderly mother knew it was quite clear I’d opened my mouth to defend children who Haringey wasn’t defending and they almost immediately accused me of child abuse.’

Nevres Kemal began work at the council in late August 2004. London-born, of Turkish Cypriot parents, she had specialised in child protection for 15 years.

She arrived with glowing references and an impeccable record and expected to feel valued.

Miss Kemal’s immigrant parents arrived here in 1958 with just £7.50 between them and their little girl learned early to take responsibility, as their interpreter in a foreign world.

She is a typically dutiful Turkish daughter.

After her father died, she moved back into her childhood home to keep her mother company. She is also a Westernised, politically aware and independent woman

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html#ixzz1ncIjV0Cp

HUMAN TRAFICKING - THE BAYLIS FAMILY ORDEAL

HUMAN TRAFFICKING – THE SHOCKING BAYLIS FAMILY ORDEAL – message to S.O.C.A.


Posted on February 26, 2012 by butlincat

HUMAN TRAFFICKING – THE SHOCKING CRIMES AGAINST THE BAYLIS FAMILY – SINCE THE 90′s

{message here not included} to: UKHTC@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk

{SCOTLAND YARD SERIOUS ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY + media / to all MPs}

date: 26 February 2012 08:29

subject: CRIMES AGAINST THE BAYLIS FAMILY

1} VIDEO From 1 11 11 – “Meet the Baylis Family – message to Kevin + Jenvey” - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PLlTPhZOjv0

2} MUST READ!= The Baylis Story = http://baylis-family.info/

3} The Baylis family update on the 17th February 2012

AS you all know the Baylis boys, Kevin and Jenvey were abducted by fraud on the 10th October 2011,

by Mr. Dennis Gordon Nissen, DR. Jennifer Mary Gray (Mrs. Jennifer Hogg) and the United Kingdom

embassy in Mexico City. Mr. Nissen did retrieval off the children, a procedure that can only legally be

done when both biological parents are dead. The UK embassy supported the fact that the parents were

dead.


There were an international order issued, stating that the children have to live for two months in the

United Kingdom in the Care of their mother, Maryna Baylis and father Jeremy Lynn Baylis, then they

must move to South Africa with their parents, Maryna and Jeremy Baylis. So Mexico declared the

parents alive.

Nissen forced the children with the support of the UK embassy staff onto the UK embassy premises,

never to be seen again by their parents or biological grandparents.

The parents notified the authorities, in Mexico and abroad, it is being dealt with as a criminal abduction

and unlawful removal of the Baylis boys, by the authorities. The children managed to get distressed

messages to their parents via the internet and you tube.

The parents emailed the UK family courts, Royal courts of justice, only to be informed that their children

is in court proceedings in the UK, and that there was a hearing on the 21st October 2011, setting aside

any international rights on these two South African citizens, and any international orders regarding

these children are null and void. The parents cannot appeal anything decided in the Family court in the

UK regarding their children, they cannot participate in the proceedings due to the fact that they are

dead.

The parents got informed that the children are in the care of Mr. Charl Olivier and Mrs. Bronwan Howell-

Olvier, family of Nissen. The parents cannot object to where the children are, or who sees them nor

have any contact with them. The parents and their extended family have no rights to contact with the

children, the parents and their extended family is not considered as cares for the children, and will never

have contact with them again. The children are forced to have contact with their abuser and abductor,

Mr. Dennis Gordon Nissen.

THESE CHILDREN WERE UNDER HUMANITERIAN PROTECTION AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM AND

MR. DENNIS GORDON NISSEN.

The mother then got informed she can write a letter to her children as a form of contact, she wrote a

letter and then got told it is emotional abusive and harmful, as she referred to their pass and their time

in Mexico and fun things they did as a family, and activities the children did with their grandparents, and

she referred to school. This were deemed emotional abuse and emotional harmful, by SARAH BOLD, the

court appointment attorney for the boys guardian, JENNY RYAN. So the message were not passed on,

Maryna was told she can wish Jenvey happy birthday, she send him a message saying happy birthday


And that they miss him, and hope he has a great day with his brother Kevin, this were again deemed

emotional harmful and emotional abuse as she referred to his birthday, and were not passed on.



So the UK abducted the children out of a 3rd party country that protected the children against their

abuser and the UK, then they take the children to court, put them into Nissen’s family care, and then

inform them that they will never see their parents again. This is in the BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD,

accordingly to the UK LAW. THE UK WHO IS IGNORING INTERNATIONAL LAW REGARDING THESE

INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN.



The parents were given a letter, in January 2012, written by the Olivier’s. In this letter, the Olivier’s

admitted to perverting the cause of justice, the Olivier’s, has been showing the children videos of Nissen

and photos, making Nissen out to be a helpful and fun loving, and very nice person, who never shouts at

any one. They told the children that their memories the children have of the abuse they suffered by the

hand of Nissen, is nothing but untrue. They are fake memories of Nissen and not the real person. Mr.

and Mrs. Olivier are holding 2 internationally abducted children in their care. The letter included that

the children are well and are not missing their parents, they settled into life with the Olivier’s and are

happy to do what the Olivier’s wants them to do.



But 2 weeks later the parents received a copies of psychological reports that were done on the boys,

and in this report there is a letter dated end of January from the Olivier’s to the psychologist, stating

that since they had the boys, since shortly after their abduction, Jenvey, had soiling problems, he was

soiling the bed, the dinner table, the walls, poo run down his legs, and he even started to wet the bed,

the psychologist put it down to JENVEY BEING AUTISTIC AND NOT HAVING CONTROL OVER HIS BOWELS

AND BLADDER MOVEMENTS.



Jenvey suffered while living in the UK abuse by the hands of Nissen, whenever Jenvey finds himself

in a stressful, environment he has small soiling accidents. Nothing ever like what the Olivier’s were

describing, he never wet his bed since he left nappies behind. If they had contacted the parents, the

parents could have told them what it is all about. Jenvey is suffering a lot of emotional damage and

harm, he is not autistic. But the emotional upset is ignored.



Kevin is classed as autistic by the psychologist as well, and got anger problems and got hatred against

the UK. The Olivier’s pointed out in the letter to the psychologist that Kevin is negative about contact

with Nissen and so is Jenvey, they both hate England and want their mother, but the Olivier’s and Jenny

Ryan has made it clear to them that they will never see their parents again. They are now the property

of the UK; two foreign citizens is now UK property. Kevin is very violent and very moody.



The psychologist has ruled that the children cannot speak in court in the UK; they are incapable of

expressing their views of what is happening to them, as they are emotionally distressed. He also ruled

that yes they have suffered sexual abuse, psychical abuse and neglect and they can pinpoint their

abuser. They can tell the psychologist very clearly what Nissen and his friends did to them, and how he

abused others.



We need to point out that the Olivier’s perverted the cause of justice so badly that when social services

eventually did a S47 investigation against Nissen, the children were too scared to talk about the abuse

and so confuse, as to whether they can trust their own memories or not. As adults that the court say

needs to look after you, won’t hurt you will they.



But the psychologist and the Olivier’s feel that they are incapable of expressing their views in the UK

court, they are now diagnosed with AUTISM, ADHD, and they are declared so stupid, that they can’t

even feed themselves, let alone think for themselves.



So on the 10th October 2011, psychologist in an international court stated the children is not autistic,

not ADHD and that can think for themselves and that their view on the abuse they suffered has to be

considered. But the UK says no they are too stupid and emotionally unstable to testify or state their

views.



Let’s see you get pulled out of your bed at 5:30am by 35 strangers, your abuser is standing in your

house in your bedroom laughing at your distress, and you are then forced to talk about your abuse

without your parents in the room with you or anyone that you trust. You are then forced to listen

to your abuser blackmailing you with your belongings he stole in 2009. The psychologist states you

cannot leave the country with this man because you are at risk from him; this man is a danger to you.



This man storms out of the room then call the so called judge over gives him an envelope and then you

know you are being forced into the UK embassy without saying good bye to your parents and without

your clothing or toys.



You are then force to the UK against your will, you are then told you will never see your parents, you

are placed with the Olivier’s that you only ever saw 3 times in your life and the Olivier’s admitted to

that. You are then forced to have contact with your abuser as it is his right, granted by the UK court,

which is ignoring international rulings.



Then because you are frightened and cry yourself to sleep, you are classed emotionally unstable to

testify about your ordeal and about the abuse Nissen but you through.



Under the above circumstance any normal child, adult, male or female, would be emotionally

unstable, let alone a child who lived in protection for nearly 3 years against his abuser, let alone

someone who might have a learning difficulty. That does not mean that the court should not hear

them, and listen to them, even if it is just the judge on her own with them.



The Olivier’s proud themselves, in calling themselves Christians; if you search them on the internet you

find their involvement with various churches and groups. They are not experience with abuse victims,

victims that are now put back into contact with the abuser, the Olivier’s themselves states that for 72

hours around the contact day with Nissen, the children are out of sorts, Jenvey soils and wet his bed,

Kevin disappears, and they refuse to get out of the car at the contact center. But the children’s guardian,

Jenny Ryan informs the court that contact is going well, the emotional abuse and harm that goes with it

does not matter.



So this would make you wonder what work the Olivier’s do for the church in the United Kingdom, as

apparently it involves children. You have to ask yourself the question is it a front so they can scout out

under privileged children for the gang of pedophiles that Mr. Nissen belongs to, to abduct and put on

the market for sex slaves.



Jeremy and Maryna Baylis had no contact from their children they had distress messages that Kevin has

left around the internet, where he knew only his parents that truly love him, will find it.



Like the Olivier’s stated in a disgusted way in their letter to the psychologist, that it is upsetting for

them, when Kevin states that being a Baylis means everything to him as his real dad, Jeremy Baylis,

thought him to be the man he is. All Nissen ever showed him was abuse and neglect and how to hurt

people.



The parents are working with the authorities, who are dealing with the abduction of the boys, and who

is preparing the prosecution of the abductor.



It is a very hard time for the parents and their families, as the abusive emails they received from Nissen,

is being ignored by the UK court, as the children’s attorney who was aware of the abusive emails since

2010, but ignored acting on it. Nissen and the children’s guardian informed the court that the abusive

emails, were written by the Baylis family. The Baylis family can proof that the email IP addresses comes

from the UK and is fix UK IP addresses and that the devices in question belongs to Nissen and his friends.

These emails were investigated by an independent investigation company, but yet the UK will not accept

any evidence that put Nissen in a bad light. But Nissen can get his family, friends and himself to contact

the Baylis family, their extended family and their supporters, they can be abusive, rude and upsetting,

that is ok. But as soon as it get entered as evidence against Nissen, then everyone object to having it

submitted. WHY WHAT HAVE THEY GOT TO HIDE.



The receivers of the emails have given permission to friends and family to publish these emails and IP

reports, for the world to see as they know Nissen and his friends monitor all their post on the internet.

And hopefully the press will make the judge and other parties in the proceeding realize that Nissen

got a serious psychological problem. It is important to point out that his mother is bi-polar, and he is

borderline bi-polar as well, but he is more psychotic, when you read his emails it is very clear that he

remembers all crimes he commit to people, but only when he feels like putting pressure on his victims.



Nissen is nothing but an abuser, he raped his victims, he hit his victims and he seriously caused damaged

to children, but his defense is IT WAS NOT ME.



He sent abusive emails, when questioned about it, he will deny it, when proven wrong with an IP

address and location, and then he blames his friends. The one excuse given to the court was, I did not

write it, Mrs. Lyons did, I gave her a handwritten note of what I wanted her to enclose in the email.

I gave her my log in details. 5 minutes later he declared under oath that no one ever has his log in

details to his email account.



The Baylis boys have not been seen or heard of since 10th October 2011, the UK is ignoring UN and

INTERNATIONAL law, and they are ignoring the protection the boys were in. The UK is holding 2 foreign

nationals hostage, just like the others they are doing it to.



These children needs to be found and reunited with their family.



——————————————————————————————-

NORMAN SCARTH LEAVES THE COUNTRY BECAUSE OF PERSECUTION BY THE UK AUTHORITIES

Norman was due to appear at Manchester magistrates courts of injustice today...to find out the result I was told he hadnt turned up and that a warrant had been issued for his arrest for non-appearance. Then I duly received this to say hed left the country!!


"Norman Scarth would like this sending to any and all contacts ;)

World War II veteran Norman Scarth served on the Arctic Russian Convoys & in the Scharnhorst battle. Few of those men are left now, & the nation PURPORTS to regard them as 'Heroes' (though he never makes that claim). He was proud to be British until the age of 70, when he started to learn that Britain was not the land for which he thought he was fighting all those years ago. In particular, he learned that corruption is rampant in the British courts. In memory of all those who had died around him in WW2, he could not turn his back & made it his mission in life to expose the corruption. It has proved to be a very dangerous mission: The Judicial Mafia do not LIKE being exposed, & have given their police boot boys carte blanche to do whatevr they can to silence him. In collusion, they have used treachery beyond belief. Norman Scarth has been forced to flee the country & is hoping to gain asylum in Hitler's Homeland, Austria! he has had enough after more than 15 years of persecution which became serious after 1997 when he stood for Parliament & published the book, 'Cause for Concern'. It became life-threatening after his single-handed success in the European court of Human Rights brought a vital change in British law, a change much hated by lawyers & judges. He would now like to live what few months or years are left to him without the constant fear of the last 15 years in Quisling ruled Britain. On 23rd February he was due to appear in Manchester City Magistrates' Court on another malicious charge, but by that time had fled the country, saying they will have to proceed in his absence. He has lodged a Statutory Declaration with the court, statingdavid, inter alia, that Quisling Laws & Quisling Courts have no authority in Britain, & says to whoever is presiding, "Do your worst - & nobody knows better than me how evil that worst can be! 'Perfidious Albion' was never more so than now!"

STOP PRESS: It is understood the judge who presided refused to proceed with the case in his absence, & has ordered the arrest of this 86 year old Arctic Convoy Hero, & that if caught he must not be given bail. We presume he has alerted Interpol? And the 'crime' committed by this World war II veteran? Offering leaflets!!! Will the British People ever wake up to the savagery of the State they live in? It is beginning to look most unlikely.

From Norman Scarth, 21 Feb. 2012:

"Needless to say there has been no response from the Crown Prosecution Service to the message below. Nor has there been a response from the Listing Officer at Manchester City Magistrates' Court to my request that the time of the hearing there on 23rd February be later in the day than the 9.30am for which it is listed. This in spite of the fact that I had put it in writing which she told me to do when I made the request on the telephone.

Norman Scarth.

---------------------------------------------------------
From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

CC: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

Subject: IMPOSSIBLE for me to defend myself without ...

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:21:42 +0000

To the Crown Prosecution Service, Jefferson House, 27 Park Place, LEEDS LS1 2ZS. Tel: 0113 290 2700 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0113 290 2700 end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

It is IMPOSSIBLE for me to defend myself against this malicious prosecution without the computer which was unlawfully seized from me by such treacherous means. That computer has on it - OR DID HAVE - a vast amount of evidence of crime. NOT crime by me, but crime AGAINST me! (AND against the British people). And what about the laptop computer unlawfully seized from the lady who did no more than give me a lift in her car? In your 'evidence'(?) she is described as my 'co-accused', but she has never been accused of ANYTHING! True, this completely innocent lady did suffer the trauma of unlawful arrest & interrogation for ten or more hours in that frightening place known as the 'Bradford Lubyanka' (Bradford South Police Station) ! Many enquiries about her computer got nowhere, until she was finally told, "It has gone away for 'Forensic Examination', & because it is 'Low Priority' we have no idea when you will get it back". 'LOW PRIORITY!' So, this whole affair is admitted to be 'Low Priority', yet vast amounts of police time, CPS time & court time - to say nothing about taxpayers' money - are being wasted on it. Don't the CPS Rules say that in deciding whether to prosecute or not, consideration should be given to 'Whether it is in the Public Interest to do so'? Would you please inform me whether you DID take that into account? And if so, what 'Public Interest' is being served by continuing something which is not so much a prosecution as a PERSECUTION? A persecution which has been going on for SEVENTEEN YEARS now. Is it going to end before I die?

Would you please answer ALL the questions in this ssage & the earlier ones.

Thanking you in anticipation that you will do so.

Norman Scarth.

------------------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

subject: PS: Maximum sentences?

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:09:25 +0000

PS: What are the maximum sentences for the terrible 'crimes' I have committed? What sentences will you be askng for? I understand from Counsel Adam Roxborough that the offences now charged are not imprisonable? Would you please confirm this, or otherwise, as the case may be?

Norman Scarth.

------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

CC: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

Subject: Your 3 letters & 68(?) pages of prosecution 'evidence'. Cost to the taxpayer?

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:59:58 +0000

To the Crown Prosecution Service, Jefferson House, 27 Park Place, LEEDS LS1 2ZS. Tel: 0113 290 2700 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0113 290 2700 end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

I acknowledge receipt of your 3 letters dated 31st January 2012, two with ref 13BA06806/PW/KH, one ref. 13BA06806/PW/YL, along with 2 CDs & 68(?) pages of what PURPORTS to be 'evidence', in an envelope postmarked 1/2/12. It reached me on 2/2/12, just as I was leaving to surrender to bail at Leeds Magistrates' Court in response to your most malicious prosecution (Adam Roxborough, the free lance barrister representing you, tried to blame the late delivery on the Post Office, which was outrageous). You list 16 'witnesses' & ask which of them I want to give evidence in person. I will require ALL of them to give evidence in person, PLUS whichever senior police officer authorised this quite massive operation, PLUS the person who was the original complainant - claiming to be 'alarmed & distressed'! I note that seven of the 'witnesses' are PCs, & one is a PS. I would like to know the occupation & home addresses of the other eight 'witnesses'. You also ask me to say 'what issues in the case makes it necessary' (for them to give evidence in person). That is a quite ridiculous question. The answer is self evident.

I also make a request for information, but NOT with the ridiculous rigmarole of a 'Freedom of Information Request'. They are simple questions, & I would be grateful for simple answers. (a) How many CPS man/hours have been spent on this case so far? (b) What has been the cost so far? (c) What is the estimated cost in time & transport of transporting the prosecution team & all the witnesses to Manchester Magistrates' Court? Knowing only too well of the corruption which is rampant in our courts, there is a possibility that I may be found guilty. That possibility is a certainty if it is before a lawyer masquerading as a magistrate. With that possibility/certainty, I ask question (d) What is the estimated cost to the taxpayer if/when the case is taken to appeal in the Crown Court, the Appeal Court, the Supreme Court & an Application made to the European Court of Human Rights?

Sincerely,

Norman Scarth. "

------------------------------------

VIDEO:

Uploaded by NormanScarth on 9 Feb 2012

28th of June 2011 Contempt Appeal for Maurice Kirk at the Royal Courts of Justice (sic) Norman Scarth acting as McKenzie Friend when appropriate.

Maurice was refused an oral hearing and security was ordered to accompany these two 'veteran victims' out of the court.

Norman leaves them in no doubt what he thinks of them before being ejected. Maurice and Norman then took the opportunity to demonstrate outside the courts using a megaphone to enlighten passers bye as to the evil and corruption within.

Links for further information about the events in this video and the people involved in this Fight-Back

http://www.normanscarth.blogspot.com/

http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/

7800 US Veterans are suing the CIA for implanting radio control devices in their brains at US Army Edgewood Arsenal in Maryland

7800 US Veterans are suing the CIA for implanting radio control devices in their brains at US Army Edgewood Arsenal in Maryland


7800 US Veterans are suing the CIA for implanting radio control devices in their brains at US Army E

peacepink.ning.com

‎7800 Veterans experimented on at US Army Edgewood Arsenal in Maryland with biologicals and nano implants A group of military veterans in California are suing…

http://peacepink.ning.com/profiles/blogs/7800-us-veterans-are-suing-the?xg_source=activity

NORMAN SCARTH GOES TO AUSTRIA 23 FEB 2012

NORMANS BEATING

 

Norman was due to appear at Manchester magistrates courts of injustice today...Not hearing from Norman I called his home - no answer - i finally found the right court and called them who told me a warrant had been issued for his arrest for non-appearance. Then I duly received this to say hed left the country!! Can you blame him??


Norman Scarth would like this sending to any and all contacts ;)

World War II veteran Norman Scarth served on the Arctic Russian Convoys & in the Scharnhorst battle. Few of those men are left now, & the nation PURPORTS to regard them as 'Heroes' (though he never makes that claim). He was proud to be British until the age of 70, when he started to learn that Britain was not the land for which he thought he was fighting all those years ago. In particular, he learned that corruption is rampant in the British courts. In memory of all those who had died around him in WW2, he could not turn his back & made it his mission in life to expose the corruption. It has proved to be a very dangerous mission: The Judicial Mafia do not LIKE being exposed, & have given their police boot boys carte blanche to do whatevr they can to silence him. In collusion, they have used treachery beyond belief. Norman Scarth has been forced to flee the country & is hoping to gain asylum in Hitler's Homeland, Austria! he has had enough after more than 15 years of persecution which became serious after 1997 when he stood for Parliament & published the book, 'Cause for Concern'. It became life-threatening after his single-handed success in the European court of Human Rights brought a vital change in British law, a change much hated by lawyers & judges. He would now like to live what few months or years are left to him without the constant fear of the last 15 years in Quisling ruled Britain. On 23rd February he was due to appear in Manchester City Magistrates' Court on another malicious charge, but by that time had fled the country, saying they will have to proceed in his absence. He has lodged a Statutory Declaration with the court, statingdavid, inter alia, that Quisling Laws & Quisling Courts have no authority in Britain, & says to whoever is presiding, "Do your worst - & nobody knows better than me how evil that worst can be! 'Perfidious Albion' was never more so than now!"
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STOP PRESS: It is understood the judge who presided refused to proceed with the case in his absence, & has ordered the arrest of this 86 year old Arctic Convoy Hero, & that if caught he must not be given bail. We presume he has alerted Interpol? And the 'crime' committed by this World war II veteran? Offering leaflets!!! Will the British People ever wake up to the savagery of the State they live in? It is beginning to look most unlikely.
  
From Norman Scarth, 21 Feb. 2012:

"Needless to say there has been no response from the Crown Prosecution Service to the message below. Nor has there been a response from the Listing Officer at Manchester City Magistrates' Court to my request that the time of the hearing there on 23rd February be later in the day than the 9.30am for which it is listed. This in spite of the fact that I had put it in writing which she told me to do when I made the request on the telephone.

Norman Scarth.

---------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

CC: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

Subject: IMPOSSIBLE for me to defend myself without ...

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:21:42 +0000

To the Crown Prosecution Service, Jefferson House, 27 Park Place, LEEDS LS1 2ZS. Tel: 0113 290 2700 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0113 290 2700 end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

It is IMPOSSIBLE for me to defend myself against this malicious prosecution without the computer which was unlawfully seized from me by such treacherous means. That computer has on it - OR DID HAVE - a vast amount of evidence of crime. NOT crime by me, but crime AGAINST me! (AND against the British people). And what about the laptop computer unlawfully seized from the lady who did no more than give me a lift in her car? In your 'evidence'(?) she is described as my 'co-accused', but she has never been accused of ANYTHING! True, this completely innocent lady did suffer the trauma of unlawful arrest & interrogation for ten or more hours in that frightening place known as the 'Bradford Lubyanka' (Bradford South Police Station) ! Many enquiries about her computer got nowhere, until she was finally told, "It has gone away for 'Forensic Examination', & because it is 'Low Priority' we have no idea when you will get it back". 'LOW PRIORITY!' So, this whole affair is admitted to be 'Low Priority', yet vast amounts of police time, CPS time & court time - to say nothing about taxpayers' money - are being wasted on it. Don't the CPS Rules say that in deciding whether to prosecute or not, consideration should be given to 'Whether it is in the Public Interest to do so'? Would you please inform me whether you DID take that into account? And if so, what 'Public Interest' is being served by continuing something which is not so much a prosecution as a PERSECUTION? A persecution which has been going on for SEVENTEEN YEARS now. Is it going to end before I die?

Would you please answer ALL the questions in this ssage & the earlier ones.

Thanking you in anticipation that you will do so.

Norman Scarth.

------------------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

subject: PS: Maximum sentences?

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:09:25 +0000

PS: What are the maximum sentences for the terrible 'crimes' I have committed? What sentences will you be askng for? I understand from Counsel Adam Roxborough that the offences now charged are not imprisonable? Would you please confirm this, or otherwise, as the case may be?

Norman Scarth.

------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

CC: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

Subject: Your 3 letters & 68(?) pages of prosecution 'evidence'. Cost to the taxpayer?

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:59:58 +0000

To the Crown Prosecution Service, Jefferson House, 27 Park Place, LEEDS LS1 2ZS. Tel: 0113 290 2700 begin_of_the_skype_highlighting 0113 290 2700 end_of_the_skype_highlighting.

I acknowledge receipt of your 3 letters dated 31st January 2012, two with ref 13BA06806/PW/KH, one ref. 13BA06806/PW/YL, along with 2 CDs & 68(?) pages of what PURPORTS to be 'evidence', in an envelope postmarked 1/2/12. It reached me on 2/2/12, just as I was leaving to surrender to bail at Leeds Magistrates' Court in response to your most malicious prosecution (Adam Roxborough, the free lance barrister representing you, tried to blame the late delivery on the Post Office, which was outrageous). You list 16 'witnesses' & ask which of them I want to give evidence in person. I will require ALL of them to give evidence in person, PLUS whichever senior police officer authorised this quite massive operation, PLUS the person who was the original complainant - claiming to be 'alarmed & distressed'! I note that seven of the 'witnesses' are PCs, & one is a PS. I would like to know the occupation & home addresses of the other eight 'witnesses'. You also ask me to say 'what issues in the case makes it necessary' (for them to give evidence in person). That is a quite ridiculous question. The answer is self evident.

I also make a request for information, but NOT with the ridiculous rigmarole of a 'Freedom of Information Request'. They are simple questions, & I would be grateful for simple answers. (a) How many CPS man/hours have been spent on this case so far? (b) What has been the cost so far? (c) What is the estimated cost in time & transport of transporting the prosecution team & all the witnesses to Manchester Magistrates' Court? Knowing only too well of the corruption which is rampant in our courts, there is a possibility that I may be found guilty. That possibility is a certainty if it is before a lawyer masquerading as a magistrate. With that possibility/certainty, I ask question (d) What is the estimated cost to the taxpayer if/when the case is taken to appeal in the Crown Court, the Appeal Court, the Supreme Court & an Application made to the European Court of Human Rights?

Sincerely,

Norman Scarth. "

------------------------------------

THE WHO "A LEGAL MATTER" 2 VERSIONS 1965

my video of - HOLLIE GREIG, NORMAN SCARTH, MAURICE KIRK, JOHNNY GOSCH, et al =

My Generation is the debut album by the English rock band The Who, released by Brunswick Records in the United Kingdom in December 1965. In the United States it was released by Decca Records as The Who Sings My Generation in April 1966, with a different cover and a slightly altered track listing. In 2002 the album was... remixed into stereo and remastered for a Deluxe edition.

trk 1 - "A Legal Matter" [lacks lead guitar, but is available on disc two in its original mono format]

trk 2 - "A Legal Matter" (mono version with guitar overdub)

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/89862/THE_WHO__A_LEGAL_MATTER__2versions_DEC_1965/


Disclose.tv - THE WHO "A LEGAL MATTER" 2versions DEC 1965 Video

CALLS FROM MAURICE KIRK, FEB. 20,22.23

Maurice Kirk is a strong supporter and campaigner of the Musa case.

Maurice Kirk is being held on remand in Cardiff prison for breaking a restraining order he knew nothing about. He was not informed about this order, so did not know he should not have broken it, even if he did. Nevertheless they took him off to prison on Dec. 18th. The real reason will be found on his site http://www.kirkflyingvet....com/ where he explains his constant victimisation by the authorities.

Maurice called to tell of the many irregularities in his present cases – missing mail, court appearance shenanigens by the authorities, the failure to see a doctor since applying on Christmas Eve, the refusal to allow him to call and question witnesses etc.

The persecution of Maurice Kirk continues, as does his silencing by the authorities. They simply cannot allow him the normal rights one has in a court – to question and call witnesses, etc. because it would show them to be at fault - and how. It is disgraceful.

The calls from 20,22,23 Feb. 2012 =

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=105f596064ec00fff98c6fb&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

from =  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/

=================================================================================

In Maurice Kirks trial he has been disallowed to call and/or cross-examine an important witness. This is in breach of

Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights {E.C.H.R.}, specifically:

Section B: The right to a fair trial -

part 1. Guarantees inherent in the notion of fair trial -

item 1. The adversarial nature of the procedure and the equality of arms.

Feldbrugge v. the Netherlands (29 May 1986, para.44) – violation of Article 6 (1); the applicant had not been given the opportunity to comment upon the report of a medical expert.

Bönisch v. Austria (6 May 1985, paras 33-35) – the parties must have the same possibility to call experts; when an ‘expert’ is dependant by the prosecution, he had to be considered as a witness for the prosecution rather than as an expert and the accused has to have the same opportunity to use such an expert otherwise the principle of equality of arms will be violated.
 

WHAT IS IT?

THE CRYPTOTERRESTRIALS - MAC TONNIES - I'VIEW ON C2C RADIO 2009 - GET THE BOOK!!

Mac Tonnies - 'Alien Hypotheses' Coast to Coast AM Interview

Uploaded by ObjectiveSpeculator on 20 Jul 2011 -
{note = there is another i'view in which this hypothesis is discussed in another C2C prog but not as in depth as this one, with

Kevin Randle - MUST HEAR show!!!! http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2012/02/19 - and see these
=   http://www.coasttocoastam.com/search/?query=MAC+TONNIES }

"Author, blogger and Fortean researcher Mac Tonnies argued that the ET hypothesis (that aliens are visiting our world from other star systems) is somewhat of an outmoded concept, and the truth may be stranger than we can imagine, involving a myriad of overlapping explanations. The notion of parallel worlds has gained credence in the scientific world, and the aliens could represent a kind of symbiosis with beings from another dimension, he noted. The so-called ETs could be a species of intelligent non-humans, or "Cryptoterrestrials" who covertly share our planet with us. Because aliens are typically described as a bipedal and human-like species, it suggests to him they have developed here on Earth.
Yet, the prototypical alien-- the spindly, big headed 'grey,' has the physique to be an ideal astronaut with few physical requirements-- perhaps they were designed for space travel, Tonnies commented. Cultural associations also influence how the aliens are perceived. In Zimbabwe for instance, entities wearing silvery suits associated with metallic craft have been described as the "ghosts of ancestors," he detailed. Regarding the alien's reported hybridization program, we could be dealing with something beyond the understanding of our neurological hard-wiring, he said.

Tonnies sees humans themselves in a kind of transitional state, eventually merging with technology and becoming more evolved and compassionate. He also talked about how some of the artifacts on Mars, such as at Cydonia, are a genuine scientific mystery. While not yet definitive proof of ET presence, they merit serious study, he said."

...b.

HOW TO REMOVE YOUR GOOGLE SEARCH HISTORY BEFORE GOOGLES NEW PIRACY POLICY TAKES EFFECT

How to Remove Your Google Search History Before Google's New Privacy Policy Takes Effect


https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/02/how-remove-your-google-search-history-googles-new-privacy-policy-takes-effect

On March 1st, Google will implement its new, unified privacy policy, which will affect data Google has collected on you prior to March 1st as well as data it collects on you in the future. Until now, your Google Web History (your Google searches and sites visited) was cordoned off from Google's other products. This protection was especially important because search data can reveal particularly sensitive information about you, including facts about your location, interests, age, sexual orientation, religion, health concerns, and more. If you want to keep Google from combining your Web History with the data they have gathered about you in their other products, such as YouTube or Google Plus, you may want to remove all items from your Web History and stop your Web History from being recorded in the future.

Here's how you can do that:

1. Sign into your Google account.

2. Go to https://google.com/history

3. Click "remove all Web History."

4. Click "ok."

Note that removing your Web History also pauses it. Web History will remain off until you enable it again.

If you have several Google accounts, you will need to do this for each of them.

...OP = http://12160.info/page/googlesearch?xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_page

...b.

COP TASERS HANDCUFFED GIRL WHO IS NOW BRAINDEAD

What a bastard!! hell probably get a raise in pay......note the flimsiest of excuses are used to justify their disgraceful actions on another human being....








"Uploaded by 91177info on 21 Feb 2012



This video showing cop tasering handcuffed girl helped clear 267-pound Trooper Daniel Cole of wrongdoing and have released this disturbing dash cam video that captured him tasing a 100 pound, 20 year old handcuffed girl in the back as she fled.

The Florida Department of Law Enforcement determined Trooper Daniel Cole's "use of force" was justified when he tased the woman last September at the FHP Pinellas Park Substation and cleared him of wrongdoing.



The fleeing woman, Danielle Maudsley, 20, suffered severe brain damage after hitting her head on the concrete and has been in a persistent vegetative state ever since.



The video shows Maudsley fleeing a back door of the substation with Cole following closely behind.



Maudsley was arrested for her alleged involvement in two hit-and-run crashes and driving without a license.



Cole brought Maudsley to the substation to complete his paperwork before taking her to the Pinellas County Jail, according to FHP reports.



As she enters the parking lot, Cole deploys his taser and Maudsley hits the ground hard, with her head slamming into the asphalt.



"What were you thinking? What are you, stupid?," Cole can be heard asking Maudsley on the video.

"I can't get up," said Maudsley.

"I don't want you to get up," said Cole.

"I can't get up," Maudsley said again. The last words Maudsley has spoken since being tasered.



On the video, Maudsley loses consciousness about two minutes after hitting her head.

Maudsley's mother said the trooper should have used other means to stop her daughter from fleeing.

"He was right behind her. He could've reached out," Maudsley said. "It was unnecessary."

The mother hired defense attorney Kevin Haylsett, who put FHP on notice for a lawsuit.



Hayslett said Cole violated FHP's taser policy which states:

"Fleeing cannot be the sole reason for the deployment."

"When you shoot someone in the back, and they're running away, all that force -- as you saw when Danielle's head hit the concrete -- that's why they don't allow you to do that, because you can have horrible tragedies like this," Hayslett said.



With any rule, there is an exception.



An Office of Inspector General Investigation Unit report states: "Although the FHP policy on Electronic Control Devices states that a member should not use the device on a handcuffed prisoner, it also provides that there may be situations that conflict with this policy."



The report goes on to state: "In this situation, Maudsley ... removed one of her handcuffs while in the back of Cole's patrol car, and moved her handcuffs from behind her back, to in front of her body, as she attempted to flee the FHP Station. In addition, Maudsley was running towards US Highway 19 which is a high volume road."



According to the report, Maudsley had oxycodone and cocaine in her system at the time.



"The Florida Department of Law Enforcement conducted an independent review of the incident," FHP spokesperson Sgt. Steve Gaskins said. "Their investigation found that the trooper's actions were legal and within the scope of his duties."



"He would've been better off to use his nightstick on her than he would a taser," Hayslett said.



The attorney also pointed out that Maudsley only weighs about 100 pounds.



In the report, Cole said he chose to use the taser because he "felt she was more susceptible to being injured if he attempted to tackle her." Cole weighs approximately 267 pounds.



Hayslett called the dash cam video disturbing. "It's one of those videos -- when you see it and you watch her head hit the pavement -- that it's hard to get those images out of your head," he said.



Maudsley's mom said her daughter's prognosis is not good. She is likely to remain in a vegetative state.



Maudsley is now in a Ft. Lauderdale rehab center that specializes in severe brain injuries."



Category:

News & Politics



...the flimsiest of excuses are used to justify their disgraceful actions on another human being....peace...b.

MICK FARREN "AZTEC CALENDAR"

pics taken from the October 2011 Brighton gig...b.

Make a video - it's fun, easy and free!
www.onetruemedia.com

23 FEB - NORMAN SCARTH - Statutory Declaration lodged at Manchester City Magistrates' Court.‏

From: norman scarth (enscarth@hotmail.com)


Sent: 22 February 2012 03:00:33

To: gm-manmcadmin@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

This pic is from a past beating Norman had to suffer

Cc: norman scarth (enscarth@hotmail.com)

Statutory Declaration lodged at Manchester City Magistrates' Court.‏

To Manchester City Magistrates' Court.

I lodge this Statutory Declaration with the court for the case R. v Scarth, to be 'heard' on Thursday 23rd February 2012, & in doing so demand that it be part of the Court Record. The text is below, but it is also sent as an attachment, which should be easier to print. I DO intend to read it out at the 'hearing', though I do not put it forward as a 'Defence', in that I do not accept that a Quisling Court has any jurisdiction in Britain. In the event that I am too exhausted to read it out, I ask that one of my Mckenzie Friends should do so.

IF the magistrates are NOT Quislings, there will be no trial anyway, as they will throw the charges out as, 'NO CASE TO ANSWER', & Order an investigation of all those involved in the criminal conspiracy to mount this malicioua prosecution.

STATUTORY DECLARATION OF INTENT & UNDERSTANDING, DECLARATION OF CLAIM OF RIGHT:

I, Norman of the family Scarth, my home address being 36 Anvil Court, BRADFORD BD8 7QW do solemnly and sincerely declare, as follows:

It is my understanding that in lodging this Statutory Declaration with Manchester City Magistrates’ Court for the hearing on Thursday 23rd February 2012 in the case of R. v Scarth, it becomes part of the official court record of that hearing.

it is my understanding EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW is paramount and mandatory (God's Law-Ethical and Natural Law). (Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24:17-21; Deut. 1:17, 19:21; Matt., 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. Legal maxims: "No one is above the law."; "Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of a few.").

it is my understanding a statute is defined as a legislated rule of society which has been given the force of law,

it is my understanding that law and statutes are separate and distinct as evidenced by the Statutory Declarations Act 1835 which states "and for all Bodies now by Law or Statute or by any valid usage authorized"

it is my understanding the only form of government recognized as lawful in the United Kingdom is a representative one,

it is my understanding representation requires mutual consent,

it is my understanding that in the absence of mutual consent neither representation nor governance can exist,

it is my understanding people in the United Kingdom have a right to revoke or deny consent to be represented and thus governed,

it is my understanding if anyone does revoke or deny consent they exist free of government control and statutory restraints

it is my understanding the United Kingdom is a common law jurisdiction,

it is my understanding that Common Law is Law which applies to all is: No claim may be bought against me without somebody to make that claim and that claim must be for harm against them, their property or their rights. The law of agent and principal applies and that service upon one is service upon both,

it is my understanding that the people of the United Kingdom are sovereign this is evidenced by the Declaration of Rights and subsequent Bill of Rights,

it is my understanding that Parliament has no lawful authority ever to breach, surrender, lend or transfer sovereignty except when conquered in war,

it is my understanding that the signing and ratification of the various and several treaties of the European Union are in direct breach of both the Declaration and Bill of Rights,

it is my understanding that agreements made on behalf of the United Kingdom by traitors to the United Kingdom do not bind the people of the United Kingdom,

it is my understanding that all existing courts and governments are de facto only and not de-jure,

it is my understanding that government does not clearly express that one may be charged for failure to obey a de facto government or court,

it is my understanding that if one has lawful excuse one may choose to not obey a court, tribunal, statute, Act or order, and that this is evidenced by way of example in the Theft Act 1968 and the Criminal Damage Act 1971,

it is my understanding that a claim of right establishes a lawful excuse and that this is evidenced by way of example in the Theft Act 1968 and the Criminal Damage Act 1971, where belief must be that the law creates and vests a specific right to act in that way. In English law, a limited form of statutory offence is termed "claim of right". Chamberlain v Lindon [1998] 1 WLR 1252 [1],

it is my understanding that any action for which one can apply for and receive a license must itself be a fundamentally lawful action,

it is my understanding that a fully responsible adult has no need to ask for permission to do something which is fundamentally lawful,

it is my understanding a bye law is defined as a rule of a corporation and is applicable only to officers and servants of the corporation this is evidenced by the Companies Clauses Consolidation Act 1845 Sections 124 - 127, the Evidence Act 1845 section 1 and the Burgh Trading Act 1846 section 3,

it is my understanding that I can use a public notary, or any authorised officer of a court, to perform duties found under any act thus they have the power to hold court and hear evidence and issue binding lawful judgements,

it is my understanding in Law truth is sovereign (Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; Matt. 6:33, John 8:32; II Cor.13:8. Legal maxim: "To lie is to go against the mind."

it is my understanding Truth is expressed by means of an affidavit or statutory declaration (Lev. 5:4-5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev 19:11-13; Num. 30:2; Matt. 5:33; James 5:12)

it is my understanding an un-rebutted affidavit stands as the truth in Law (1 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15. Legal maxim: "He who does not deny, admits.")

it is my understanding an un-rebutted affidavit becomes the judgment in Law (Heb. 6:16-17. Any proceeding in a court, tribunal, or arbitration forum consists of a contest, or "duel," of affidavits wherein the points remaining un-rebutted in the end stand as the truth and the matters to which the judgment of the law is applied.)

it is my understanding a matter must be expressed to be resolved (Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21. Legal maxim: "He who fails to assert his rights has none.")

it is my understanding a lien or claim can be satisfied only through rebuttal by Counter affidavit point-for-point, resolution by jury, or payment (Gen. 2-3; Matt. 4; Revelation. Legal maxim: "If the plaintiff does not prove his case, the defendant is absolved.")

it is my understanding that a summons is merely an invitation to attend and the ones issued by any court creates no obligation or dishonour if ignored,

it is my understanding that I have the power to refuse intercourse or any interaction with police officers who have not observed me breach the peace,

it is my understanding that I have the right to refuse to interact or co-operate with criminals, de facto government agents or negligent police officers,

it is my understanding that if I have the power to appoint directly or by proxy I must have the power to fulfil those duties myself,

it is my understanding that clause 39 “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or exiled or in any way victimised, neither will we attack him or send anyone to attack him, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land", and clause 40 "To no-one will we refuse or delay right or justice”, of the original Magna Carta 1215 are still in effect, and that the expression "law of the land" shall mean Common Law.

Therefore be it now known to any and all interested, concerned or affected parties, that I, Norman of the family Scarth am a freeman, this is evidenced by the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 1,

I hereby serve notice and state clearly specifically and unequivocally my intent is peaceful and lawful, though I do reserve the right to use whatever means may be necesary to defend myself when under attack from the Quislings who have now seized every position of power in Britain.

I claim the right to use force to protect my property, thus preventing any other entity claiming the right to use force or violence in regard to my property.

I claim the right to claim, collect, receive or be paid any pension if I have paid into it, or am otherwise entitled to, and claim that said right is not affected by anything I do,

I claim the right to use force to protect my physical body in all circumstances, thus preventing any other entity claiming the right to use force or violence in regard to my physical body.

I claim the right to refuse to supply an intimate or non-intimate sample of DNA for any purpose, without my written and notarised consent.

I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counter claim, cannot claim good faith or colour of right and that such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court.

I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by police officers, government principals or agents or justice system participants is FIVE HUNDRED GB POUNDS PER HOUR or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed or otherwise regulated and FIVE THOUSAND GB POUNDS PER HOUR or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and notarised consent. Also if violence be done to either me or those under my care and protection the fee shall be FIFTEEN THOUSAND GB POUNDS in addition to any compensation that may be awarded.

I claim the right to use a declaratory judgement, statutory declaration , charging order or warrant, to secure payment of the aforementioned FEE SCHEDULE against any transgressors who by their actions or omissions harm me or my interests, directly or by proxy in any way.



ALL THE ABOVE RELATE TO BRITISH LAW.



Tragically, I now state we no longer have British Law in Britain, but QUISLING LAW.



The charges against me are malicious, the latest in a catalogue of persecution which started 17 years ago. That being so, it is not 'Law' - it is WAR under the PRETENCE of Law, not only against me, but against the British People! Quislings have done by stealth what Hitler failed to do by force, turning Britain into a Ruthless, Lawless, Murderous & Merciless Orwellian Police State! For several decades now, Quislings governments have been imposing Quisling laws upon us, to be enforced by Quisling Courts. Neither Quisling laws nor Quisling courts have any authority in Britan - other than the power which comes out of the barrel of a gun! See my message sent to the Crown Prosecution Service, which they have contemptuousl ignored.

I will NOT defend myself in ANY of your Kangaroo Quisling 'courts' until the computer, mobile phone & other items STOLEN from my Sheltered Housing flat by Quisling thugs masquerading as police officers are returned to me. Most treacherous, criminal means were used to gain access to the block of Sheltered Housing where I live &; in collusion with even MORE treacherous people (Incommunities Ltd, with whom I have a contract to protect me from such crime); even GREATER treachery to trick me from my home to commit an unlawful arrest, to UNLAWFULLY enter my home & UNLAWFULLY steal the equipment which has on it a vast amount of evidence of corruption generally & of crime against me, by the very same 'Police' Force, & by others. That evidence is VITAL to defend myself against these malicious & ridiculous charges. Until that computer is returned to me there can be no trial. To deny me that computer & that evidence is itself 'Perverting the Course of Justice', A CRIME SUBJECT TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT!



More importantly I will not defend myself in ANY Quisling Court until the computer STOLEN from the lady who did no more than give me a lift in her car is returned to her, with meaningful compensation for the theft & for the trauma inflicted on her. The above crimes were accomplished with treachery beyond the comprehension of normal people.



On the computer there is – OR WAS – evidence of seventeen years of persecution by criminal elements within Agencies of the British State. The persecution became serious & potentially lethal from the age of 74, following my SINGLE-HANDED success in the European Court of Human Rights (Scarth v UK, 33745/96). It brought a vital change in British Law, incorporated into the 1998 Human Rights Act, a change much disliked by lawyers & judges. On 8th August 1999 (just 17 days after the ECt-HR ruling) came the first murderous attack on me by a mob-handed gang of West Yorkshire Police, being used as a Private Army. It was in fact an attempted assassination, very clever in that, if successful, it would have been 'Death from Natural Causes'. It failed only because my constitution proved stronger than most men of my age. There has been a nation–wide cover-up of that police crime, & 12 years of attempts to silence me, including unlawful arrest, false imprisonments, malicious prosecutions, Kangaroo Courts, robbery, defamation & further assaults - & STILL CONTINUING, this malicious prosecution & this hearing being part of it.



Those actively involved include Police, Court Service Staff, Judiciary (ACTING FROM PARTICULAR MALICE), Prison Service, Crown Prosecution Service, Council Officers & Councillors, most of whom can be named & called as witnesses.



Unfortunately, some among those who purport to be the ‘Forces of Law & Order’ (the Police & the Courts) are themselves involved in the persecution, & not only refuse to investigate or prosecute others who have wronged me, but unlawfully block me from that which has been the Right of everyone in the land from centuries before the police or the CPS were invented: the Right to start & progress a Private Prosecution. Sadly, the legal profession is a very jealous one. The endemic hostility towards the Litigant In Person runs throughout the profession, equalling that of the Nazis for the Jews.



One would have thought my success in the European Court of Human Rights would have brought me respect from the professionals. On the contrary, their hostility towards the ordinary LIP is doubly so against the successful one. It is worst of all against the LIP intending to start a Private Prosecution. There is tacit collusion between the Forces of Law & Order to deny the protection of The Law to whistle-blowers like me.



However, they go much further than just to deny protection, but deliberate obstruct the one who seeks a remedy in the courts himself. The result is ‘ONE-WAY LAW’: - Law to protect the powerful, Law to oppress those who are not. And Heaven help he who dares to protest at this state of affairs! It is NOT British Law, which is 'Two-Way Law'!



Crimes have been committed against me INFINITELY greater than the malicious charges I am now facing. .



As said above, we are all ‘Equal in the eyes of the Law’: If I can be prosecuted, then I too can prosecute. That is how it actually WAS under BRITISH LAW. As said above, Quislings have done by stealth what Hitler failed to do by force, & we now have QUISLING LAW - & that means ‘ONE-WAY LAW’: For more than a year now I have been seeking to start ‘Private Prosecutions’ in many different magistrates’ courts but have met criminal obstruction in each of them. My latest attempt was in Leeds Magistrates’ Court on 12th January 2012 when I ‘Laid the Information’ in a SWORN AFFIDAVIT, which, as you know, is much more than is legally necessary. Until Summonses are issued against those named in the affidavit, then I will not defend myself against the malicious charges against me.



I claim the right to convene a proper court de jure in order to address these criminal actions by police officers, government officials, principals or agents or justice system participants who, having been served notice of this claim fail to dispute or discuss or make lawful counter claim and then interfere by act or omission with the lawful exercise of properly claimed and established rights and freedoms.

I claim the right to deal with any counter claims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture both video and audio evidence of said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose as I see fit.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein, or make their own counter claims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action. Responses must be under Oath or attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and received via registered mail to:

36 Anvil Court, BRADFORD BD8 7QW, West Yorkshire, no later than TEN (10) days from the date of original service as dated by way of Royal Mail recorded delivery service.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgement and permanent and irrevocable estoppels by acquiescence barring the bringing of charges under any statute, act or regulation against myself, Norman of the family Scarth for exercising these lawful and properly established rights, freedoms and duties.

and I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835.



THIS DECLARATION WOULD NORMALLY BE MADE BEFORE A SOLICITOR WHO WOULD WITNESS THE SIGNING OF THE DECLARATION. Such is the hatred of the legal professionals towards the Litigant in Person, when I asked two solicitors in Bradford to witness my signing of an affidavit they told outrageous lies in refusing to do so.



First I called at the Office of Solicitors Direct, 109-113, Carlisle Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire BD8 8BY, & told a young man what I wanted to do. He asked for my passport & the affidavit, took them both from me, and then disappeared from my sight with them both, which worried me a little. About ten minutes passed before he came back with a Mr Lamb, who told me that the wording was wrong, it should say ‘declaration’. I have sworn affidavits before & knew he was not telling the truth. He did not offer to draw up the affidavit ‘correctly’ but said he could not help me, so I left.



I then telephoned Hansards Solicitors, 13 Duckworth Lane, BRADFORD BD9 5ER, & spoke to a man telling him I needed to swear an affidavit that was already drawn up. He told me to call at his office & I could swear it there. I went to the office, handed him the affidavit, which he looked at, then told me “This is no good, it has to be drawn up by a solicitor”, which, as you know is a blatant lie. I mildly suggested he was wrong, at which he made a move as though to eject me out of the door (bear in mind I am 86 years old). I told him if he laid a hand on me I would retaliate. I had not been in the office more than three minutes but he called to a member of staff, “Call the police”. The conduct of Solicitors Direct was bad, but this was far worse. It WILL be reported to the Law Society.



Fearing similar treatment (OR WORSE!) if I ask a solicitor to witness the signing of this Declaration, I now verify the truth of it by SWEARING BEFORE ALMIGHTY GOD, that the facts stated above are true. I trust that Almighty God might be considered of higher standing than a Quisling Solicitor!



Sworn by Norman Scarth on the 20th day of February 2012. N.Scarth



.‏

LATEST FROM NORMAN SCARTH 21 FEB. 2012

From Norman Scarth, 21 Feb. 2012:


"Needless to say there has been no response from the Crown Prosecution Service to the message below. Nor has there been a response from the Listing Officer at Manchester City Magistrates' Court to my request that the time of the hearing there on 23rd February be later in the day than the 9.30am for which it is listed. This in spite of the fact that I had put it in writing which she told me to do when I made the request on the telephone.

Norman Scarth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

CC: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

Subject: IMPOSSIBLE for me to defend myself without ...

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:21:42 +0000

To the Crown Prosecution Service, Jefferson House, 27 Park Place, LEEDS LS1 2ZS. Tel: 0113 290 2700.

It is IMPOSSIBLE for me to defend myself against this malicious prosecution without the computer which was unlawfully seized from me by such treacherous means. That computer has on it - OR DID HAVE - a vast amount of evidence of crime. NOT crime by me, but crime AGAINST me! (AND against the British people). And what about the laptop computer unlawfully seized from the lady who did no more than give me a lift in her car? In your 'evidence'(?) she is described as my 'co-accused', but she has never been accused of ANYTHING! True, this completely innocent lady did suffer the trauma of unlawful arrest & interrogation for ten or more hours in that frightening place known as the 'Bradford Lubyanka' (Bradford South Police Station) ! Many enquiries about her computer got nowhere, until she was finally told, "It has gone away for 'Forensic Examination', & because it is 'Low Priority' we have no idea when you will get it back". 'LOW PRIORITY!' So, this whole affair is admitted to be 'Low Priority', yet vast amounts of police time, CPS time & court time - to say nothing about taxpayers' money - are being wasted on it. Don't the CPS Rules say that in deciding whether to prosecute or not, consideration should be given to 'Whether it is in the Public Interest to do so'? Would you please inform me whether you DID take that into account? And if so, what 'Public Interest' is being served by continuing something which is not so much a prosecution as a PERSECUTION? A persecution which has been going on for SEVENTEEN YEARS now. Is it going to end before I die?

Would you please answer ALL the questions in this message & the earlier ones.

Thanking you in anticipation that you will do so.

Norman Scarth.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

CC: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

Subject: PS: Maximum sentences?

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 10:09:25 +0000

PS: What are the maximum sentences for the terrible 'crimes' I have committed? What sentences will you be askng for? I understand from Counsel Adam Roxborough that the offences now charged are not imprisonable? Would you please confirm this, or otherwise, as the case may be?

Norman Scarth.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: enscarth@hotmail.com

To: leeds.courtadmin@cps.gsi.gov.uk; leeds.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk; gerry.wareham@cps.gsi.gov.uk

CC: keir.starmer@cps.gsi.gov.uk

Subject: Your 3 letters & 68(?) pages of prosecution 'evidence'. Cost to the taxpayer?

Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:59:58 +0000

To the Crown Prosecution Service, Jefferson House, 27 Park Place, LEEDS LS1 2ZS. Tel: 0113 290 2700.

I acknowledge receipt of your 3 letters dated 31st January 2012, two with ref 13BA06806/PW/KH, one ref. 13BA06806/PW/YL, along with 2 CDs & 68(?) pages of what PURPORTS to be 'evidence', in an envelope postmarked 1/2/12. It reached me on 2/2/12, just as I was leaving to surrender to bail at Leeds Magistrates' Court in response to your most malicious prosecution (Adam Roxborough, the free lance barrister representing you, tried to blame the late delivery on the Post Office, which was outrageous). You list 16 'witnesses' & ask which of them I want to give evidence in person. I will require ALL of them to give evidence in person, PLUS whichever senior police officer authorised this quite massive operation, PLUS the person who was the original complainant - claiming to be 'alarmed & distressed'! I note that seven of the 'witnesses' are PCs, & one is a PS. I would like to know the occupation & home addresses of the other eight 'witnesses'. You also ask me to say 'what issues in the case makes it necessary' (for them to give evidence in person). That is a quite ridiculous question. The answer is self evident.

I also make a request for information, but NOT with the ridiculous rigmarole of a 'Freedom of Information Request'. They are simple questions, & I would be grateful for simple answers. (a) How many CPS man/hours have been spent on this case so far? (b) What has been the cost so far? (c) What is the estimated cost in time & transport of transporting the prosecution team & all the witnesses to Manchester Magistrates' Court? Knowing only too well of the corruption which is rampant in our courts, there is a possibility that I may be found guilty. That possibility is a certainty if it is before a lawyer masquerading as a magistrate. With that possibility/certainty, I ask question (d) What is the estimated cost to the taxpayer if/when the case is taken to appeal in the Crown Court, the Appeal Court, the Supreme Court & an Application made to the European Court of Human Rights?

Sincerely,

Norman Scarth. "

ANDY MCCARDLE - KILLED BY AUTHORITIES

 Andy Flynn = from  http://www.masonfitup.blogspot.com/

MI5 The UK's domestic security service acts in complete secrecy as the UK's secret police force.

One can safely assume that MI5 officers use a similar network of informers as the main stream domestic police force but without the same minimal level of scruitiny afforded by the police complaints commision.

Indeed one former MI5 officer talks of whistle blowing on any corruption being met by persecution, imprisonment or even mysterious deaths.

 http://www.deliberation.info/whistleblowers.ex-mi5-officer-speaks-at-trial-of-tony-blair/

Looking closer at the case of Andy McCardle; the testimony of this former MI5 agent explains how he was framed and his murder covered up.

On witness states that MI5 officers threatened to kill his family with a fake gas explosion if he did not agree to a fake confession.

Link to daily mail article of MI5 murder threat.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1195484/if-i-didnt-confess-7-7bombings-MI5-officers-rape-wife-claims-torture-victim.html

These two article tell of a sorry state of affairs with a domestic secret police force free to carry out crimes including murder and framing innocent victims without any scruitiny.

Posted by Andy Flynn at 11:26 1 comments Links to this post

Andy McCardle discovered corrupt Strath Clyde police involved in corruption and drug dealing.

After trying to report his findings he was framed for crimes he did not commit and jailed. He was then moved to Carstairs mental institute and drugged against his will for continuing his claim of police corruption.

Andy was then killed and his murder covered with a pathologist report claiming that he had died of natural causes (a heart attack).

When Andy's body was examined he was found to have head injuries including a broken eye socket and other injuries indicating he had met a violent end.

While it appears that Andy's case is isolated there is no way of telling how often this kind of murder is happening in the UK and being covered up.

In my experience and according to some press reports the corruption is extensive with police officers using the freemasonary network to cover up their illigal activity.

The structure of freemasonary with members being recruited from all levels of society would sugest that other members exchange favours with their police officer brothers meaning that criminal elements can call upon corrupt police officers when required.

My research has left me in no dout that the corruption includes setting individuals up for crimes they did not commit, covering up murders and faking dissapearances after murdering their targets in the persuit of favours for those in the favour of freemasonary.

Posted by Andy Flynn at 04:37 0 comments Links to this post

Sunday, 12 February 2012

With large numbers of police officers being freemasons and their oath taken to put the requests of "brothers" (other freemasons) before their legal obligations as police officers, freemasonary has infiltrated and corrupted not only the police service, it has infiltrated all levels of the establishment and society including poleticians, journalists, the judiciary, customs officials and other important elements of the British establishment.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/08/phone-hacking-scandal-jonathan-rees

The Guardian article unveils to the public just a small snippet of the corruption running through UK Police and security services including running or protecting large scale prostitution operations for the benefit of fellow freemasons be they freemason police, business men or corrupt members of the establishment.

Posted by Andy Flynn at 02:21 0 comments Links to this post

Friday, 10 February 2012

In 2009 a criminal gang attempted to extort money from a Telford man in his own home. The criminal thugs claimed they were collecting a large gambling debt run up by another individual in an illigal gambling establishment run by organised crime.

This attempt to extort money was caught on cctv and clearly showed the vehicle regerstration number.

The victim of this crime was told by the thugs "its no good going to the police, they wont help you". Using his head he made a report to Manchester police.

The initial investigation identified that the vehicle being used was an unmarked police car. It was later found that the criminals attempting to extort money we escorted by a plain cloths police officer.

Over the coming months the victim of this crime was threatened to with draw his statement. After much perserverance a single officer recieved a 2 year jail term although it is doubtless that this corrupt officer was acting without the help of fellow officers

Posted by Andy Flynn at 07:04 0 comments Links to this post

Corruption in the British judiciary.

Freemasons use a hierachy and all freemasons swear an oath when joining. Meaning that they are bound before anyother duty.

This means that if a judge who is a freemason is hearing a criminal case and the defendant is a freemason of a higher level than the judge then the likely hood of a just trial is slim. Recently two individuals were convicted of the murder of stephen lawrence after the orgional prosecution case collapsed.

Some elements of the national news media have reported that the two individuals convicted of the murder had family members who were conected to powerful underground figures with senior contacts in the police and the judiciary causing the origional murder prosecution to collapse.

BBC News reported that the home secretary is to force police officers and judges to declare freemasonary membership

http://www.news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk/politics/57381.stm

it goes without saying that the origional lawrence murder prosecution may well have collapsed due to freemasonary involvement.

Posted by Andy Flynn at 04:17 0 comments Links to this post

The police criminal network

UK police use a network of informers who in reality are criminals with access to criminal gangs.

This realationship works in both directions with criminal informants allowed to commit crimes and left unchecked, often even tipped of about any investigation in to their activity by serving police officers.

This illigal activity is completely unmonitored and a breeding ground for corruption.

It is estimated that over 70 percent of police officers are freemasons. Indeed one former police officer told me "they are all freemasons".

Over the years there have been many reports of corruption and even murder based around freemasonary. It is clear that freemasonary has direct access to the large network of criminals controlled by corrupt police officers under the guise of police informers.

MORE =
▼ Feb 20 (2)

■ ■ MI5 The UK's domestic security service acts in com...

■Andy McCardle discovered corrupt Strath Clyde poli...

■► Feb 12 (1)

■With large numbers of police officers being freema...

■► Feb 10 (3)

■In 2009 a criminal gang attempted to extort money ...

■Corruption in the British judiciary.

■The police criminal network

PEOPLE UNJUSTLY IMPRISONED

In prison since 28th November 2011 and Robert Green since Friday 17 Feb


What is worse: when innocent parents are imprisoned or when supporters of innocent victims of child abuse are imprisoned?

■ the Musas have had one court hearing after the other delayed

■ they have been ‘produced’ to the wrong court

■ they have not been produced

■ McKenzie Friends are not being given legal visits to take documents in and out

■ they are not allowed to telephone each other and are given other limitations on whom to call, if at all

■ mail does not get delivered to them

■ clothes have been attempted to be delivered dozens of times, but they are never on the list, despite numerous applications.

In other words, instead of being treated as ‘guests’, as they are on remand, they are being treated as if they were convicted criminals.

Not having legal representation in their civil case, means they have to make do with McKenzie Friends. Meanwhile, their lawyers in the criminal case don’t succeed in getting them bail…

To illustrate the viciousness of what we are up against, Robert Green who has been exposing 22 paedophile abusers of Hollie Greig, a young woman with Down Syndrome, was imprisoned for 9 months of ‘breach of the peace’ and 3 months of breaching bail conditions.

There are a lot of people who do not like this injustice!!! Join the world wide protest against child abuse on 6th March!

COMMENTS:

butlincat says:

February 20, 2012 at 4:19 pm

The Musas were imprisoned on the 31st November, not the 28th October.
They are NOT being treated as convicted prisoners should be. For a start, convicted prisoners get mail in and out, money is allocated to them in a comparitevely short space of time as compared to the Musas position at present, and so on..

They are treated much WORSE and nowhere near how convicted prisoners are treated. I am told a prison warder has been sacked for aiding one of the Musas, as a great majority of the prison staff even say they shouldnt be there in prison as they arent criminals.

It is Haringey alone who are keeping them imprisoned, as in no way can they allow the public to know their shocking crimes theyve committed against these 6 children and their loving parents. The abhorrent foster care parents and their handlers I am told have even made the children wear spectacles when there was nothing wrong with their eyesight in the 1st place, and keep your eyes peeled on the adoption sites for pics of the Musa children under assumed names, being prostituted as children ripe for fostering, as the adoption processes for the Musa children have apparently begun.

Under British law adoption procedures cannot take place if any child is still under the jurisdiction of his/her parents, and there are 6 children in this family who fit this criteria exactly. To advertise these children of sites, especially under fake names or start adoption procedures is a blatant crime in this case which must be investigated thoroughly and properly by honest parties.

The public are now being made aware of what is going on in the secret courts and the crimes committed by ruthless council social workers and connected and that is why mass demonstrations are beginning to happen – the system has broken down, and the criminals within it must be brought to book, and innocent children must be returned to their proper homes with their true parents who often have done no wrong whatsoever, as the Musas havent..

Haringey council must be investigated properly and thoroughly, as must their appalling legal employees involved in this case.

The Solicitors Regulation Authority refuse to do anything about the rogue “guardian solicitor” and her higher-up for the Musa children, after official complaints were sent in 3 times about their appalling professional ethics, which allowed the eldest daughter Favour not to be seen by anybody connected to the family for over 18 months since she complained of being sexually abused by a member of the foster family she was placed with, sadly.

The Legal Ombudsman, who must take responsibility for the SRA’s actions have completely shirked their responsibilities and actually told me “not to write again” about my notifying them of criminal behaviour by this “guardian solicitor” and the SRA’s refusal to deal with it.

The Ombudsman also told me their department was “closed” to me, which is illegal too when reporting such atrocities as have happened. This is disgraceful, and is part of the overall conspiracy to pervert the course of justice perpetrated by Haringey council employees. certain rogue members of the judiciary, the same in Highgate / Hornsey / Tottenham police, and many others connected to this shocking Musa case.

It is disgraceful how they all get away with it by defending each others crimes and completely ignoring the blatant wrongdoing, and the MPs and Chief Constables to absolutely nothing either when told about it all.